Trump Administration Imposes ICC Sanctions on 4 Judges: The Trump administration imposed ICC sanctions on four judges on June 5, 2025. These judges were involved in cases against Israel and the US. The sanctions blocked their entry into the US and froze their assets.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the move, calling it protection against “illegitimate” ICC actions. The court criticized the decision, calling it an attack on judicial independence. Israel praised the sanctions, while allies expressed mixed reactions.
Also Read | Gaza Ceasefire Veto: US Faces Global Backlash After Vetoing UN Resolution for Gaza Ceasefire
Trump Administration Imposes ICC Sanctions on 4 Judges: Insights
- The US sanctioned four ICC judges over investigations into Israel and the US.
- Sanctions include travel bans and asset freezes.
- Israel supports the move, calling the ICC “politicized.”
- The ICC says the sanctions threaten its independence.
- Previous US administrations had a mixed approach to the court.
Background
The ICC investigates war crimes when national courts fail to act. Neither the US nor Israel recognizes its authority. In 2021, the ICC launched probes into alleged crimes in Gaza and Afghanistan. The US previously sanctioned an ICC prosecutor in 2020 under Trump. Biden later reversed those sanctions but criticized the court’s Israel investigations.
Main Event
On June 5, 2025, the US announced ICC sanctions against four judges. Two were involved in arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. The others worked on a US-Afghanistan war crimes probe. Secretary Rubio said the US would protect its sovereignty and allies.
The ICC called the sanctions an attack on its independence. Over 120 countries support the court. Israel’s PM Netanyahu thanked the US, calling the ICC biased.
The sanctioned judges include Beti Hohler and Reine Alapini-Gansou. Both participated in cases against Israeli officials. The other two, Luz del Carmen Ibanez and Solomy Balungi Bossa, handled the Afghanistan investigation.
In February, the US also sanctioned ICC prosecutor Karim Khan. He faced misconduct allegations and stepped aside. The US and Israel argue their courts can handle war crimes fairly.
ICC headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands, as the court faces US sanctions over its probes into Israel and Afghanistan.
Photo Credits: AP.
Implications
The ICC sanctions deepen US-ICC tensions. Allies like Britain may face legal dilemmas if Israeli leaders visit. Hungary supports the US move, while the EU remains divided. The sanctions could weaken global trust in the ICC. They also signal strong US-Israel ties under Trump.
Conclusion
The ICC sanctions mark a major US escalation against the court. Future actions may depend on the 2024 US election, which experts warn could harm international justice efforts. For now, the ICC vows to continue its work despite pressure.
